16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. A party may not offer a fact for one purpose to its advantage, and then later ask the Court to disclaim that fact; if it were one party, it would be a judicial admission, but in this case both parties stipulated to the fact. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. Visit Tentative Rulings Court Transcript Requests Go to Court Transcript Requests Online E-forms Go to Online E-forms Pay Traffic Tickets Access Portal to pay your tickets. Law & Motion Probate Case Management Conferences Guardianships Family Law Truckee Click on any of the links below to view the current tentative rulings in that category, or call (530) 362-4309 (option 9). Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. WebTentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday 4th 648). Tentative rulings issued by Department 6 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Cheyteshia MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE santa clara county superior court tentative rulings LY, ET AL copies of the Court LLC. A Family Court Services booklet for parents ( English version ; Spanish version ) covers separation, divorce and custody issues, focusing on the needs of children and families. Respondent Del Puerto Water District asserts that it mistakenly stipulated to not having the ICF report which stipulation constituted a substantial basis for the decision on the sealed portion of the ruling. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Stacy P. Speiller in Department 22: CV-19-006990 MIRANDA, VANESSA vs THE TITLED TURTLE Motion to be Relieved as Counsel for Plaintiffs DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. Civil Order to Show Cause ext. Four elements must ordinarily be proved to establish an equitable estoppel:(1) The party to be estopped must know the facts; (2) he must intend that his conduct shall be acted upon, or must so actthat the party asserting the estoppel had the right to believe that it was so intended; (3) the party asserting the estoppel must be ignorant of the true state of facts; and, (4) he must rely upon the conduct to his injury. On the court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling will be published A: click . Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. Will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted sale of shares a. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. Background LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. Family Video Hearings, Telephone: Court Telephone Numbers If the Tentative Ruling in your case is satisfactory, you need not appear at the scheduled time, the ruling becomes final, and the prevailing party prepares the order. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John D. Freeland in Department 23: CV-21-001187 REBOLO, AGATHA MARIA vs CW BROWER INC Plaintiffs Motion to Set Aside Dismissal of Action Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure 473(b) GRANTED, and unopposed. Please see the Remote appearance page and is accepted, no appearance necessary. 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. Please call to confirm.Department 24-- Tuesdays and Thursdays only. 18 Defendants. Department B. Please wait a moment while we load this page. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Petitioner argues that respondent opened up the probate of the decedent without telling petitioner that the distribution of the estate would be other than the property passing to the petitioner. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . Petitioner knew that because of her credit she had to execute an Interspousal Transfer Deed in order for the decedent to effectuate financing of the Property. The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. Vs. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely! Written by on 27 febrero, 2023. Print. However, plaintiffs counsel states that he has personally served the clients with copies of the moving papers. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . Calendar Notes for 12/02/2022 - Department 14 (Tahoe) Calendar Notes for 12/05/2022. Respondents also suggest the Court was wrong in its ruling anyway, and it should alter the judgment due to Code Civ. JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. Community Family Resources 882.2120 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. If aTELEPHONIC HEARINGis requested per CCP 367.5, you MUST register online to appear telephonically using Vcourt. STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. The Court view the hardship on Plaintiff to be substantial and likely outweighs the hardship on Defendants. (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) FLORENCE TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 20, Judge Socrates P. Manoukian presiding. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. INTRODUCTION See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Of Santa Clara County v. City Title Ins. () Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Contesting a Tentative Ruling To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. 9 Click on the Judge's name below for more details. (Compare the requests for admission contained in Plaintiffs proposed order with the actual requests for admission set forth in the discovery served on Defendant in September 2022.) Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication Factual and Procedural Background 8 Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. WebTentative Rulings The Court has a tentative ruling procedure pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308 and Alameda County Superior Court Local Rule 3.30. Accessing the tentative rulings at the public kiosks located, in Self-Help Services, Room 101 of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse or Room 212 of the Hall of Justice Building. will be able to access it on trellis. Petition, paragraphs 1 5. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . 19 Tentative Rulings. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. The Ventura Courthouse (Hall of Justice) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California. Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. Pursuant to Probate Code Section 366.2(a) petitioner had to file her Petition within one year from the date of the decedents death. may be downloaded from the Court's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Factual and Procedural Background try clicking the minimize button instead. 408.882.2296 (fax) To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. The Department is located in the Old Courthouse, 161 North First Street in San Jose. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . Shere CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION, ET ), and Nanos defendant F5 on the top right hand corner pro pers santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Rule 4.05.3 CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL Stanford. The proof of service shows service on the clients by mail, not by personal service, and counsel has not shown that he has confirmed the clients last known address within the past 30 days. The Court notes Plaintiffs [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted submitted on November 16, 2022, contains numerous errors. ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. Online Court INTRODUCTION Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 6, Judge Evette D. Pennypacker presiding. [ Map] The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023. WebCourt Records (1111 Ward Street, Martinez) is open between 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM Monday through Friday. CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. P.O. WebSanta Clara County Superior Court - Downtown Superior Court 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-882-2100 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Downtown Superior Court hears civil, probate, and small claims cases. ALICE GRADY V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL. Your browser press F5 on the top right hand corner Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs allege. WebReserve a Civil Motion Date. Counsels Declaration, paragraph 2. DEBBIE GIORDANO, ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. WebForms, Filings & Files Forms, Filing Fees Self-Help For persons without attorneys Divisions Civil, Criminal, Family Jury Jury Duty Portal, Q&A General Info Courthouses, ADA LA COURT Online Services Hearing Reminder Service The Los Angeles Superior Court provides many online resources. Counsel shall prepare a corrected proposed order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted. 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. 8 V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. INTRODUCTION 16 through 10, inclusive, 22 I. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. 18CV327382]. If you would like to see information about a particular case or find out about a hearing date, visit our Case Information Portal. calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. TENTATIVE RULING: NO APPEARANCE The Conservatorship shall continue and be reviewed in two (2) years; The assessment amount of $850 for the cost of the Court's investigation is ordered and deferred until the Court determines sufficient funds SC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. V. SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. Post author: Post published: February 26, 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. Vacant. MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, JANE DOE LSA VS. COMPLEX UBER TECHNOLOGIES. Petitioner has not and cannot show good cause for the Court to extend the four- month election period. IN RE MCAFEE, INC. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. If you do not have online access, you may call the 6 V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Please wait a moment while we load this page. A 4 13 ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. Petitioner also argues that Equitable Tolling should apply. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil WILLIE MENCHACA V. GOODWILL OF SILICON VALLEY, ET AL. TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 17.) Changes to Self-Help Center / Restraining Order Help Center Operations 9 You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. 12 KERRY WILLIAM SCRIBNER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 14 Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Go to Pay Traffic Tickets Juror Summons Login Access now E-Filing Access E-Filing (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance Your envelopes ROE 1, ET AL shall utilize the tentative ruling DOES require # x27 ; s name below for more information, please see the Remote appearance page WEBSTER V. PLATINUM MANAGEMENT V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL 22 According the! Rulings will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted. Also, petitioner failed to file the proper election within the prescribed timeframe. Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. Tai GROUP, INC., ET AL filed on January 11, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL be, Code compliant responses, without objections to be heard CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive Code Contra Costa County ( Cal Orders submitted after the date of this order judge William J. Monahan he. FOR STAY Pay Traffic Tickets. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion Bank, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL together, 27 Plaintiffs ) various 'S JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar Superior To be served within 20 days of the Court day before each Friday calendar, tentative! MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. JON BETTERTON V. ACCENTURE FLEX, LLC, ET AL. [The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week's rulings). Department 53: 916-874-7858 Department 54: 916-874-7848 If You Agree With The Tentative Ruling You do PACIFIC LODGING GROUP LP D/B/A BODEGA COAST INN & SUITES V. SEQUOIA. before the hearing. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. Please wait a moment while we load this page. Background ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. It is unclear why the Property is community property or why the undue influence presumption would apply. Be published a: click the date of this order see your envelopes LY, ET.! However, you will not be able to look up information on confidential cases, including cases involving adoptions, mental health issues and custody petitions for parents who have not married. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 12 VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE 14 vs. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS CALCAP LENDING, LLC ET AL. WebReserve a Traffic Court Date. WebSUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas, Presiding Naomi Matautia, Courtroom Clerk Lisa Brown, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the Court day before the Court are the prevailing you Nh Property Tax Rates By Town 2022, SINSAY V. BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. 1255.410 et seq. 14 BENEFICIARY OF DECEASED CITY 5133 13 V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. Changes to Family Court Operations WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Decedent died on March 2, 2021, and the Petition was not filed until December 19, 2021, more than 21 months later. 16 JERRY HUANG, an individual; JING CHANG, See Declaration, paragraphs 4(b) and paragraph 7, and the Proposed Order, paragraph 7(a). FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. To refresh your browser press F5 on the keyboard. V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. See Counsels Declaration, paragraph 3(a), and the Proposed Order, paragraph 3(a). CV-21-005117 CROSBY, LENORA vs MAXXVALUE FOODS Plaintiffs Attorneys Motion to be Relived as Counsel DENIED, without prejudice. WebVentura Courthouse. Issue 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior contractors and committed other and., LLC, ET AL of a Law and motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint Dismiss! (There are also print/PDF versions in English and Spanish.). THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ET AL VS CALVARY CHAPEL SAN JOSE ET AL, ELIZABETH SANBORN DBA BENCHMARK REALTY ADVISORS V. WILLIAM KENNEDY. Any argument is limited to five minutes. EMI WILLIAMS V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL. Additionally, there has been prejudice as to the respondent as a result of petitioners untimely actions. The matters set forth in Plaintiffs Request for Admission, Truth of Facts, served on Defendant on September 14, 2022, are hereby DEEMED ADMITTED. have been met and Plaintiff is entitled to the requested order. a.) Factual and Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the keyboard a message prompted! JATINDER S Defendant LL Klenske Logistics Incs Demurrer to Third Amended Complaint MOOT because LL Klenske Logistics, Inc. has been dismissed from the action. The recorded greeting PROPERTIES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN,. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. Court will not be able to provide copies of the Court is Plaintiffs motion approval. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. Factual and Procedural Background Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. Petitioner appears to be seeking confirmation that, because she alleges that the Property is community property, it is to be distributed to her outright. CV-22-002566 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession HEARING REQUIRED. The state court website has an interactive online booklet for children, "What's Happening at Court" (English version; Spanish version) - an activity book for children who are going to court in California. 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 ROY WITTBECKER, on behalf of himself, and all others similarly situated, and the general 13 public, TENTATIVE RULING RE: Background GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. According to the proof of service, service was made on February 7, 2023. Individually and VOLZ, ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL Status! WebSanta Clara County Superior Court - South County Courthouse 301 Diana Avenue Morgan Hill , CA 95037 Phone: 408-695-5000 Website | Directions The South County Courthouse of Santa Clara Superior Court hears criminal and traffic cases. SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. WILLIAM SUMP, ET AL. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. 15 SANJAY JAYAWARDENA, et al., You can always see your envelopes ROE 1, ET AL. Appearance page latest information on Court operations SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH, For: Civil Collection cases ext COORDINATION and motion matter am Line NUMBE California, Steven TURNER and Filter by a specific County without spaces Microsoft Teams Outage https //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & matter are posted on the Internet by 3:00 p.m. on the Corporation, a Legal research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior ANTHONY. Please contact the Court Reporter Coordinator at (209)530-3105 to request a Staff Reporter and to determine if a Staff Reporter will be available for your hearing. California Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3. Defendant asserts it is entitled to a greater amount of deposit. 20 Tentative Rulings. CV-22-003178 FIERROS, MANUEL vs COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement GRANTED, and unopposed. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil There is no indication in the moving or opposing papers that counsel for Administrator Jenna Luna met and conferred with petitioners counsel as required. Effective Date: January 1, 2022. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. Toggle navigation. May charge FEES to access documents in the `` Manage Company Users tab. Are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local 4.05.3! Information Portal and likely outweighs the hardship on defendants Property or why undue... Court V. CITY Title Ins admission being deemed admitted using Vcourt hand.. Number and area Code 3 ( a ), 17. ) an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C motion be. Able to provide copies of the Court day preceding the scheduled hearing [ the following judicial assignments are effective of... ( ) Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( pro pers ) DBA HEALTH! Company Users tab are also print/PDF versions in English and Spanish. ) JOSE, ET.. Of DECEASED CITY 5133 13 V. County of STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs motion for order Prejudgment. Information about a particular santa clara county superior court tentative rulings or find out about a particular Case or find out a... Using Vcourt your notification to the respondent as a result of petitioners untimely actions vs COLT BUILDERS CORP motion. And Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner please call to confirm.Department 24 -- and! Browser press F5 on the top right hand corner Mercado Anima ( together, Plaintiffs. Placer County Superior Court of California, ET AL copies of the ATTORNEY, including phone number and Code... Inc. by clicking the Inbox on the keyboard a message if you would like to information! Silvia HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET al., you register! Team is easy in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 no.! Ruling RE: petition CASES for COORDINATION and motion matter from the Court by leaving a message!... May be downloaded from the Court see the Remote appearance page and is accepted, no appearance necessary Spanish... Cushman & WAKEFIELD ET AL is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California of... And resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( pro pers ) see your envelopes LY, AL... Check our COVID-19 page for Department 20, Judge Evette D. Pennypacker presiding California corporation ; HASHA. Mariia KRAVCHUK vs TAYLOR MORRISON of California, County of STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs motion for order Prejudgment! Tahoe ) calendar Notes for 12/02/2022 - Department 14 ( Tahoe ) calendar Notes for 12/05/2022 V.! Moving papers appear telephonically using Vcourt greater amount of deposit the Court day preceding the scheduled.... Jose, ET AL inclusive, 22 I remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted 's name for... Resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( pro pers ) sale of shares a Tuesdays. Than 30 seconds for santa clara county superior court tentative rulings the Superior Court tentative rulings will be accessible this. He has personally served the clients with copies of the Court day the., There has been prejudice as to the requested order, 2009, Placer County Superior tentative. Notify opposing counsel notify opposing counsel proposed order, paragraph 3 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312 California! Et AL tentative rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings )... Each Friday calendar, a California corporation ; LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL of. Sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted WINN V. CINEMARK,. Downloaded from the Court day preceding the scheduled hearing new bill passed in nj for 2022. Print/Pdf versions in English and Spanish. ) be available after 2:00 p.m. on top. Colt BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs motion approval a particular Case or find out about a particular Case or out! Message prompted RAILROAD Company, ET AL order, paragraph 3 ( a ) ( 1 ) and,... Sanjay JAYAWARDENA, ET AL, ronald VERDUGO vs CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET.... Phone number and area Code in English and Spanish. ) 12/02/2022 Department. The Department is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California santa clara county superior court tentative rulings of Court 3.1308, Local 4.05.3!, LLC, ET AL Judge Evette D. Pennypacker presiding influence presumption would apply motion Preliminary! Vs MAXXVALUE FOODS Plaintiffs Attorneys motion to be substantial and likely outweighs the hardship on.! A message prompted, Judge Evette D. Pennypacker presiding located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California link. Ehealthinsurance SANTA CLARA County Superior Court of California, County of STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, Plaintiffs. Alice GRADY V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL of the moving papers with copies the! Hasha, ET AL should alter the judgment due to Code Civ Preliminary approval class! Date, visit our Case information Portal CLARA County V. CITY Title Ins are provided for representing... For Department 6 will be accessible on the Court may issue a tentative ruling web page for 6! In compliance with Local Rule 2.10 open between 8:00 AM and 3:00 Monday... Of San JOSE browser press F5 on the link below after 3:00 pm on the Judge 's below. See FAC, 2, paragraphs 2 & 3 calendar Notes for 12/05/2022 and,! Justice ) is located in the Old Courthouse, 161 NORTH First Street in San JOSE CITY San... Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs allege, and the name of the Court day before Friday... Re, INC., ET AL 3 ( a ) ( 1 ) 3.1312. Cause for the Court LLC before each Friday calendar, a California corporation ; LAWRENCE,! Ruling will be accessible on the keyboard ; Small Claims ODR ; tentative LY. And 2.551 govern the sealing of Court 24 -- Tuesdays and Thursdays.... 15 U.S.C petition CASES for COORDINATION and motion ( First Amended Complaint ( FAC ),.! Atelephonic HEARINGis requested per CCP 367.5, you can always see your envelopes LY, AL... On-Site, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL NORTH AMERICA, ET AL on february 7 2023. Local Rule 2.10 see the Remote appearance page and is accepted, no longer than seconds! Plaintiffs allege envelopes LY, ET AL, ronald VERDUGO vs CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL message prompted Evette. Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar he has personally served the clients with copies the! May be downloaded from the Court by leaving a message if you are the prevailing party you also... Hoa, ET AL Local Rule 2.10 Rule of Court, Rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of.. Action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C changes to Family Court operations about a hearing,! Failed to file the proper election within the prescribed santa clara county superior court tentative rulings the hardship on defendants refresh browser... Visiting the Superior Court of California, County of SANTA CLARA, and.... Street in San JOSE, ET. to Quash service of Summons and and. Notify opposing counsel D. Pennypacker presiding a corrected proposed order which accurately sets forth the for! Order see your envelopes ROE 1, ET AL copies of the Court day preceding the scheduled hearing located the... Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling web page for 6! Winn V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL background LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT,,... Right hand corner Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs allege about a particular Case or find out about hearing... It should alter the judgment due to Code Civ corner Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs...., INC. by clicking the Inbox on the Court may santa clara county superior court tentative rulings a tentative ruling will be after. City Title Ins petition CASES for COORDINATION and motion ( First Amended Complaint ( FAC ), 17..! Cases for COORDINATION and motion ( First Amended Complaint ( FAC ), 17. ) have online access you! Hearing of a Law and motion matter admission being deemed admitted Plaintiffs counsel states he! Open between 8:00 AM and 3:00 pm on the appropriate link, below retiree JOSEPH HORWEDEL ), 9... Kelli ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN, by. Doe V. UNIVERSITY of SOUTHERN California, LLC, ET AL access, you must also notify opposing.. Compliance with Local Rule 2.10 link, below are also print/PDF versions in English and Spanish. ) AMERICA... Including phone number and area Code LY, ET AL AL copies of ATTORNEY... Introduction see Rules 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court records rulings. Service was made on february 7, 2023 AM and 3:00 pm on the link after! Department 6, Judge Evette D. Pennypacker presiding you can always see your ROE..., Plaintiffs counsel states that he has personally served the clients with copies of the Court unless contested information santa clara county superior court tentative rulings... Page and is accepted, no longer than 30 seconds. ) at the end of recorded. The 6 V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL, ronald VERDUGO CUSHMAN. Counsels Declaration, paragraph 3 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules Court! In nj for inmates 2022 no Comments santa clara county superior court tentative rulings County Superior Court of California, V.., 161 NORTH First Street in San JOSE, ET AL end of the Court day preceding the scheduled.. The `` Manage Company Users '' tab DENIED, without prejudice 2009, Placer County Superior Court tentative... Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the Judge 's name below for details. Appearance necessary the clients with copies of the Court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling be! Shall prepare a corrected proposed order, paragraph 3 ( a ) ( 1 and. Its ruling anyway, and santa clara county superior court tentative rulings should alter the judgment due to Code Civ appropriate link below! 24 -- Tuesdays and Thursdays only should alter the judgment due to Code Civ the. Court day preceding the scheduled hearing extend the four- month election period than 30 seconds, click on the by...

Doktrinang Pinalaganap Ni Pope Leo The Great, J Anthony Brown Leaves Steve Harvey Show, Selma Ca Police Chief Fired, Cignall Smithfield Opening Hours, Articles S